Solomon Asch's experiments demonstrated that:

Solomon Asch's experiments are significant in demonstrating the power of peer influence on individual behavior and beliefs. His work focused on how individuals would often conform to a group's incorrect consensus, even when they possessed accurate information that contradicted the group's views. This phenomenon is known as conformity, and Asch's studies highlighted that people may alter their opinions or perceptions to align with those of a peer group, especially when they feel pressure to conform.

The experiments involved participants being asked to judge the length of lines while in a group setting where confederates (who were in on the experiment) provided incorrect answers. Many participants conformed to the group's wrong answers, illustrating the impact of social pressure on decision-making and opinions.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately capture the essence of Asch's findings. Those who prefer to stand alone in their beliefs would contradict the core message about conformity. Group discussions leading to better decision-making don’t reflect Asch’s emphasis on conformity leading individuals away from accurate judgments. Likewise, the assertion that individual beliefs are always stronger than group consensus is not supported by Asch's observations, as his research showed that group opinion could overpower individual reasoning.