According to Max Weber, which factors contribute to a person's social class beyond economic standing?

Max Weber's theory of social class extends beyond the singular dimension of economic wealth to include three primary components: class, status, and party (or power). While “class” often refers to the economic aspect, such as wealth and income, “status” encompasses a person's prestige or social recognition, which can be influenced by lifestyle, education, and cultural consumption. “Power” pertains to one's ability to influence or control others, often manifesting through political means.

In this view, status reflects the social honor associated with a person’s vocation, lifestyle choices, or community standing—not solely their wealth. For example, a person with a stable income might belong to a high social status due to their respected occupation, while another with greater wealth might be viewed with less prestige if their social behaviors are out of alignment with societal norms.

The other options, while they may reflect important aspects of social structures, do not encompass Weber's comprehensive approach. Culture and ethnicity pertain to identity and social groupings but are not as precise in outlining the multitude of factors that Weber identifies. Education and wealth are certainly factors in social class but fall under the broader category of the economic dimension. Similarly, occupation and social networks can play significant roles in determining social standing but do not fully